Come gather ‘round people, wherever you roam
………….
For
the time, they are a-changin'
Come senators, congressmen, please heed the call
Don’t stand in the doorway, don’t block up the hall
For he that gets hurt will be he who has stalled
The battle outside ragin’
Will soon shake your windows and rattle your walls
For the time, they are a-changin’
Come mothers and fathers throughout the land
And don’t criticise what you can’t understand
Your sons and your daughters are beyond your
command
Your old road is rapidly aging
Please get out of the new one if you can’t lend
your hand
For the times, they are a-changin’
Bob Dylan – Lyrics – The
Times They Are A-Changin’
'(On July 7th,2007, I had written a blog “Race,
Religion & Politics - Race .This is a continuation of this. )
Over the last few months, I have read and seen the
following:
Book - Caste by Isabel Wilkerson
Interesting book about the trials and tribulations of African Americans and comparisons with the Dalits in India and the Jews during
Hitler’s Third Reich.
Television show - The Loudest Voice - It is about
Roger Ailes, the person who set up Fox News for Rupert Murdoch.
Movie - The Deacons of Defence - 2003. It is based
on a 1964 true story about a group of African Americans who took up arms to
challenge the anti-black police, judiciary and the Ku Klux Klan in a small town
– Bogalusa, Louisiana and succeeded.
CNN - Mobs laying siege to the Capitol in
Washington on January 6th.
Your obvious question is what is the link between
them?
The start of racial abuse and discrimination started
when the first slave ship arrived in Virginia about 400 years ago. A national culture
was created where Americans perceived that the white population should be the dominant
majority and the African slaves remain a minority - not deserving of equal rights and
dignity. Now, the minorities in the USA are getting together and voting for a
party which they feel will provide them equal opportunities.
The second concern among the right-wing
conservatives is the rise and influence of the “leftist liberals”, particularly
among the recent immigrants who are now becoming political and standing for
election at the state and federal level. The conservatives fear that they would
push for increased taxes and handouts to the poor thus disincentivizing them
from seeking jobs. This in spite of the gap between the wealthy and the
poor being at an all time high.(1)
It is perhaps worth going back into time, since
America has a relatively short history. Their goal when they declared
Independence was to be a Republic and have a democratic form of government which
would be a model for the rest of the world.
The opening lines of the American Declaration of
Independence in 1776, read as follows:
We hold these truths
to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by
their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life,
Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
While the words were
inspiring,14 out of the 21 signers of the document had at various times held
slaves. Thomas Jefferson, the person who drafted the original draft of the
Declaration of Independence, is believed to have continued holding slaves and
had an African American slave as his mistress and who bore him children (2).
From the early days
there was a tendency for America to be not just a White dominated country, but
for some of the Founding Fathers it was to be a White Anglo Saxon Protestant
nation. In the 1750’s Benjamin Franklin was concerned that “.... Pennsylvania,
founded by the English, (would) become a Colony of Aliens, who
will shortly be so numerous as to Germanize us instead of our Anglifying them,
and will never adopt our Language or Customs, any more than they can acquire
our Complexion.”
Similarly, “The
Spaniards, Italians, French, Russians and Swedes, are generally of what we call
a swarthy Complexion”. He was not alone. In
spite of the lyrics in the musical Hamilton “Immigrants, we get the job done,” Hamilton, Jefferson and some of others felt the same way (3).
The slave owning
practice continued and in fact increased over the next century. While the North
was industrializing, the South was increasing the land under cultivation and
using slaves to carry out the hard labour. When Abraham Lincoln was elected
President in 1860, he tried to end slavery. The Southern States decided to
break away from the Union, resulting in the Civil War which the North
won.
After the Civil War,
the Congress passed the Thirteenth, Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the
Constitutions and the Civil Rights Act of 1866 which granted full citizenship
to the freed slaves, including the right to vote.
Its Section 1 stated “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and
subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of
the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which
shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States;
nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without
due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
The first African American member of the Senate, Hiram Rhode Revels was elected in 1870. However, the
equal rights in the Southern States were short lived.
As a means of
allowing the country to get back to normality, the federal troops were
withdrawn from the South in 1877 and this allowed the Southern States to regain
control of their state legislatures. This enabled them to pass laws which
restricted the rights of the African American people, including the right to vote by
imposing new requirements for poll taxes, literacy tests and strict residency
and other requirements which were difficult to satisfy. In addition, they
passed the Jim Crow laws which segregated transportation, public facilities and
daily life.
The US Supreme Court
in 1896 supported these laws under the fig leaf of “separate but equal”
judgement. In 1954 the Supreme Court reversed this but the discrimination
continued.
This led to extreme violence,
including lynchings and race riots against the black population, mainly in the
South. It also gave rise to the right-wing organisations such as the Ku Klux
Klan and other white supremacist groups.
As a result of the
violence and discrimination, the African Americans started moving out of the Southern
States. The Great Migration happened in two waves – the first wave from 1916 to
1940 when about 1.6 million African Americans went from the rural South to Northern
industrial cities, the second wave from 1940 to 1970, around 5 million African American people moved to the North and West where they could exercise their right to
vote. The percentage of African Americans living in rural areas declined from 47 percent
to 16 percent between 1950 and 1990 (3).
It is interesting to
note that Abraham Lincoln the President who tried to end slavery was from the
Republican Party. The Southern States were primarily White, Democrat and in
favour of slavery. The switch started in 1932 when Franklin Roosevelt’s “New
Deal” programs offered economic relief to deal with the Depression. By the
mid-60’s the majority of the African American voters were voting for the Democrats.
As the land mass in America
expanded to more states, there was a large influx of European immigrants. Initially,
the Germans, Italians and Irish all went through the phase of being
discriminated against, but once they assimilated, they all began to develop the
characteristics and behaviour of what Isabel Wilkerson calls “the dominant
caste “and they also discriminated and mistreated the African Americans.
To build the rail
roads across America there had been an influx of cheap Chinese labour. Also, in
the early 1900’s a group of Sikhs landed in Northern California. To prevent
America becoming a multicultural nation, the government controlled the racial mix
through the immigration laws restricting the flow of new immigrants from
different parts of the world, and in some cases even restricting the ability of
immigrants to bring their families. The group of Sikh immigrants who settled in
Northern California married Mexicans and established the first Sikh community
around Stockton. They tried legal means to obtain citizenship.
Following the
attempt by two Japanese Americans Takao Ozawa and Takauji Yamashita, a Sikh named Bhagat Singh Thind petitioned the Supreme Court. He had
served in the US Army and fought in World War I. He was granted citizenship
twice and which was rescinded both times. His argument to the Supreme Court was
unique.
Thind argued that he was Caucasian, Aryan
in fact, descended from the same stock as Europeans, given that it was widely
held that Aryans migrated south to India and formed that country’s upper caste.
It could be said he had a more rightful claim to being Caucasian than the
people judging him. After all, the Caucasus Mountains were next to Iran and
closer to neighbouring India than western Europe .His appeal was
declined but he was ultimately granted citizenship in 1935.(4)
In the early 1900’s
the immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe began to outnumber those from
the Northern and Western Europe and in 1921 and 1924, caps were set for total
annual immigration and quotas imposed for the Northern and Western Europe
countries. In the forties and the fifties, America started to relax the
immigration laws and the racial mix began to change.
Starting 1943, and
later in 1952 a limited number of Chinese and Asian were allowed to immigrate.
In 1965, laws were changed to allow reunification and skilled immigrants were
allowed in. Later in 1986 and 1990, the Immigration Reform and Control Act
focused on allowing refugees from Indochina, Nicaragua and Haiti and other war-torn
countries (5).
The change in
immigration laws led to the increase in population and to the United States
becoming a more multicultural society. The U.S. population in 1900 was 76 million. In 1950, it rose to 152
million; by 2000 it had reached 282 million and 331 million in 2020. By 2050,
it is expected to reach between 422-458 million, depending on immigration. The
percentage share of the white population has been dropping since
1950. From 59.7% in 2020, it is expected to drop below 50% in 2045 to 44%
in 2060. The Hispanics will be the second largest group followed by the African Americans and Asians.
The Jim Crow laws
lasted until 1965. It was the Civil Rights Movement in the mid-sixties, led by
Martin Luther King Jr, who inspired by Mahatma Gandhi, protested non-violently,
and which ultimately led to President Lyndon Baines Johnson passing the Civil Rights
Act of 1964 and The Voting Rights Act of 1965. These acts outlawed
discrimination based on race, colour, religion, sex, national origin and
subsequently sexual orientation and gender identity. They also did away with
unequal application of voter registration requirements, racial segregation in schools, public accommodations, and employment discrimination.
In 1964 after signing the Civil Rights Bill President Johnson predicted that
the Democrats would lose the South for the generation for supporting the
African - Americans. For over half a century no Democrat running for Presidency
ever won a majority of the white votes” (4).

The passing of the
Bills caused some concern that the non-whites combined with the liberal left
from the East and West coasts were going to take over the country. The fear was
that after almost four centuries, the skin-based colour dominance would be
coming to an end as the racial mix became more diversified.
This fear was not
limited to just the rich and middle class. Even the poor and working-class
whites were concerned, perhaps even more so, because the feeling of entitlement
based purely on their skin colour was gradually being taken away. Roger Ailes
was the first to recognise the impact it would have on American society as the
ethnically distributed population began to change America.
Roger Ailes worked
as a political consultant to Richard Nixon, Ronald Regan and George H.W. Bush
and others including Mitch McConnell, Quayle and others. Apparently, he also
helped Donald Trump, including writing his speeches. After working for CNBC, he
convinced Rupert Murdoch to help him launch Fox News in 1996.
According to an
article dated May 2011 in the Rolling Stone Magazine, Roger Ailes’s viewers
market “…. are old, with a median age of 65. The audience is also almost
exclusively white – only 1.38 percent of viewers are African-American. “Roger
understands audiences,” says Rollins, the former Reagan consultant. “He knew
how to target, which is what Fox News is all about.” The typical viewer of
Hannity, to take the starkest example, is a pro-business (86 percent), Christian
conservative (78 percent), Tea Party-backer (75 percent), with no college
degree (66 percent), who is over age 50 (65 percent), supports the NRA (73
percent), doesn’t back gay rights (78 percent) and thinks government “does too
much” (84 percent). “He’s got a niche audience and he’s programmed to it
beautifully,” says a former News Corp. colleague. “He feeds them exactly what
they want to hear. This understanding of the demographics helped make Fox News
the most viewed channel and a cash cow in Rupert Murdoch’s media empire”. (6)
The interesting
thing about the Trump fan base is that there is also a small percentage of coloured
persons (including Asian) who voted for him. Their rationale perhaps - the tax
cuts which he was promising.
From the time Obama
began contemplating his candidacy, Fox News went all-out to convince its white
viewers that he was a Marxist, a Muslim, a African American nationalist, a 1960s type
radical and strongly pushed the “birther” conspiracy theory - insisting that
President Obama was not born in the United States.
While everyone
thought Obama got elected because he was biracial, spent most of his childhood
in Indonesia and Hawaii, had Asian roommates, studied in Ivy League schools was
an “acceptable African American , “the reality was that the majority of the whites did not
vote for him. “Only an estimated 43 percent of the whites voted for him - close
to two third did not vote for him in 2008 and even less 38 percent voted for
him in 2012.
President Obama’s two
election successes also proved to the African Americans the power of their
votes. This was the trigger point for some of the right-wing organisations and
brought out the passive Republicans to vote for Donald Trump. His campaign team
also did their best to try and disenfranchise the African American voters and with the
support of right-wing news media such as Fox News, Rush Limbaugh and others,
together with the use of social media, Donald Trump defeated Hillary Clinton in
2018.
They tried to employ
the same tactics in 2020. In subtle and not
so subtle ways, the African Americans continued to be discriminated against. They tried to
take away their right to vote by various means, including redrawing the
districts or the proof of identity required to vote.
Biden’s victory was
in no small measure due to the support from the African American community,
starting from his primary victory in South Carolina. Stacy Abrams ten-year
effort was instrumental in swinging Georgia to turn blue and helped the
Democrats win the two Senate seats which gave them a 50-50 split in the Senate.
Like the Deacons of Defence, the African Americans together with the Asians and
some Hispanics were better organised and came out in large numbers to vote. In
addition to Joe Biden, they helped Kamala Harris, the first woman of colour,
get elected as the Vice President, in spite of President Trump and his team’s
various attempts to claim that the results were fraudulent.
When all attempts to
overturn the results of the election failed, a large number of the Republicans
again attempted to do what the opposition party did in the 1890's. At that time
a group of Whites and African Americans called Fusionists - whose objective was to seek free
education, debt relief and equal rights for the African Americans, won every
state-wide office in 1896, including the governorship in North Carolina.
In 1898 during state wide elections, a group
of white Supremacists called the Red Shirts rode into Wilmington and started
intimidating the voters. A Democratic leader named Alfred Moore Waddell gave a
speech urging insurrection, demanding that white men stop the (African Americans) from
voting and to shoot them if they refuse. They then forced the resignation of
the government and appointed their own Mayor. Within two years new segregation
laws were passed and the (African American) population were stripped of their right to vote.
The number of African American voters dropped from 125,000 in 1896 to about
6000 in 1902 (7).
Is this the
beginning of the end of the single ethnic dominated society? With the changing
racial mix over the next three to four decades, my personal view is that the
minorities (African Americans, Hispanics, Asians) will all get better organised
and you will see a bigger mix of different colours in both houses.
The first Asian to
be elected to the US House of Representatives was a Sikh, Dalip Singh Saund
from 1959 to 1963. This year there are 109 non-white members in the Congress
and 9 in the Senate. The change is also being felt in the business circles as
well, as you see more companies being led by Asian and African American senior management.
Also, the share of the multiracial group will grow as America finally becomes
the melting pot.
It will be
interesting to see how the two political parties react to the change? Will the
Republicans move more to the centre? The Democrats more to the left to
accommodate the newly elected immigrant politicians who are pushing to reduce
the gap between the rich and the poor? Will the Republicans split with groups such
as the Lincoln Project group forming their own party? Will the gap between the
rich and the poor continue to grow as it has been over the last three decades? Will
this result in more social unrest? The issue then moves from race to economic
issues.
Multicultural
America will once again be a model for the world. You will also see the
European countries following America as their share of the non-whites increases
and the minorities get better organised. The UK and Canada are perhaps slightly
ahead with the South Asians already sharing the stage with the whites. The
twenty first century will the century when the world truly becomes global. The
exception will be Asia.
India is already the
United States of India, but it appears now to want to change to a religion-based
majority dominated country. China and Japan the other two large economies are
probably the only two countries which are racially pure and are reluctant to
open the doors to other races. With the
aging population, it will be interesting to see how these countries cope and
whether they will change in any way. Will they be able to maintain their
economic growth?
In the medium- and
long-term globally, race will be less of an issue. Will it be religion where many
of the recent immigrants, particularly in Europe are Muslims? Will this
create tension among the different religions? Time will tell.
As Bob Dylan said
during the 60’s …. The Times They Are A-Changin’.
They certainly are but at a much faster pace.
1. Source: US Census
Bureau and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. – Pew
Research Centre
2.https://www.britannica.com/topic/The-Founding-Fathers-and-Slavery-1269536
3. https://qz.com/904933/a-history-of-american-anti-immigrant-bias-starting-with-benjamin-franklins-hatred-of-the-germans
4.Caste by Isabel Wilkerson
5.America Becoming: Racial Trends and Their Consequences: Volume I (2001)
6.The Rolling Stone:
May 25,2011: How Roger Ailes Built the Fox News Fear Factor
7. BBC.com - Stacey Abrams: The
woman behind Biden's biggest surprise - 10th, November 2020
8. “How U.S. immigration laws and rules have
changed through history by D’Vera Cohn - Pew Research Centre